// quality

what a certificate
has to prove.

Independent testing of consumer-facing peptide products has repeatedly found measured purity far below label claims, and in some samples elemental contamination above limits that would apply to an injectable product. A label proves nothing. This is what we publish instead.

// 01 identity

mass spectrometry, every lot

Confirms the vial holds the molecule on the label, at the right mass. The certificate names the method and prints the observed figure against the theoretical one — not a pass/fail tick.

// 02 purity

RP-HPLC to ≥ 99%

The chromatogram is published, not summarised. A percentage without a trace behind it is an assertion.

// 03 content

assay reported separately

Purity and peptide content answer different questions. A vial can be 99% pure and still be substantially counter-ion and residual solvent by mass, so both numbers appear.

// 04 contamination

the panel most skip

Bioburden, endotoxin, heavy metals and residual solvents. This is the section absent from most certificates in circulation, and the reason we publish ours in full.

// what testing cannot establish

the honest limits.

Being straight about this matters more than the claims above.

  • A certificate describes the sample tested, not necessarily every vial in the lot — which is why multiple vials per batch are sampled rather than one.
  • Sterility of the specific vial in your hand cannot be proven by any certificate.
  • Conditions during shipping and after delivery are outside anyone's control once it leaves.
  • No amount of analytical testing makes a research reagent safe or appropriate for use in a person. That is a different question, answered by clinical trials that mostly do not exist for these compounds.
// check our paperwork against theirs our index publishes a free certificate checker that grades any COA — including ours — against these five criteria and names what is missing. We did not ask for favourable treatment and did not get it. open the checker ↗